William O'Neil
"In O’Neil terms, POLN shows rising EPS, strong AuM growth, several ‘New’ catalysts, improving RS near 52‑week highs, and favourable supply via buybacks—while trading at a reasonable multiple with a healthy cash return. Buy on constructive pullbacks toward the 50‑day (~900p) or on a clean breakout to new highs with strong volume. Reassess if H2/H1 comps reveal weakening organic fee growth ex catch‑ups, if PC IV momentum fades, or if price loses the 200DMA on heavy volume."
Overview
An O’Neil-style investment analysis of Pollen Street Group Limited (LSE: POLN), a FTSE 250 alternative asset manager focused on private equity and private credit, assessing fundamentals, price/volume action, and CAN SLIM factors to decide if the stock is a BUY, HOLD, or SELL.
Financial and Business Overview
Pollen Street operates a dual-engine model: (1) an Asset Manager that earns recurring management fees, performance fees and carried interest from third‑party funds across Private Equity and Private Credit; and (2) an Investment Company that invests on-balance-sheet alongside its funds, generating investment income and aligning LP interests. H1 2025 results were strong: Total income £63.8m (+17% YoY), operating profit £30.9m (+28%), profit after tax £27.9m (+18%), and EPS 46.0p (+25% YoY). Fee-paying AuM rose 37% YoY to £4.7bn (Total AuM £6.1bn), driven by successful closes for PE Fund V (€1.5bn, >€2bn including co-invest) and strong fundraising/deployment for Private Credit Fund IV (PC IV), which exceeded its initial £1bn target by Q3 2025 (£1.1bn). Management fees grew 79% to £37.9m in H1, aided by £8.4m catch‑up fees (one-off and not expected in H2). Guidance reaffirmed: H2 fund management income will be lower due to no catch-up fees, performance fees to normalize towards the lower end of long‑term guidance (15–25% of FMI), fee‑paying AuM to continue rising with PC IV deployment, and Investment Company returns for FY25 expected in line with FY24. Capital returns have been meaningful: since Jan 2024 the group returned £70.6m (dividends and buybacks), including a 27.0p interim dividend and £29.2m buybacks; shares in issue declined to c.60.2m with 4.0m in treasury. Balance sheet/leverage: interest‑bearing borrowings ~£206m; tangible net asset value c.£357m; net debt-to-tangible equity ~56%. Valuation at c. 954p implies ~10.8x trailing P/E on TTM EPS ~£0.88 and an indicated dividend yield around mid‑single digits (c. 5–7%) based on recent run-rate dividends.
Market Position & Competitive Advantages
Pollen Street is positioned in secularly growing private markets, emphasizing mid‑market alternatives and asset‑based lending—areas benefitting from institutional demand, the UK Mansion House reforms, and the broader rotation into private credit. Advantages include: (1) Fundraising momentum and diversification: PE Fund V closed above target with a broadened LP base (North America/Middle East), PC IV surpassed its £1bn target by Q3. (2) Scalable, high‑margin recurring management fees: Fund management EBITDA margin reached 43% in H1 (aided by catch‑ups), with medium‑term ambition >50%. (3) On‑balance‑sheet investing supports AuM growth and alignment, while producing consistent mid‑ to high‑single digit underlying returns. (4) Strengthened governance/talent: new Chair (Lynn Fordham), new CFO (Crispin Goldsmith), and an Abu Dhabi office underpin expansion in key LP markets. Risks: fee cyclicality tied to fundraising and deployment; variability of performance fees; temporary equalisation effects depressing reported returns when funds scale; credit cycle sensitivity in private credit; valuation marks in private assets; leverage (~£206m) that needs disciplined risk management; and potential macro/regulatory changes that could slow LP allocations to alternatives.
Stock Performance
Price ~954p, within 2% of 52‑week high (972p) and ~50% above the 52‑week low (634p). The 50‑day (~904p) and 200‑day (~817p) moving averages are rising, with price above both—an O’Neil positive. 12‑month change ~+29% (structured data) and +16% per alternate source timing; near‑term technicals show constructive higher highs/higher lows and rising 50/200DMA slopes. Liquidity is adequate for a UK mid‑cap (avg 3‑month volume ~108k shares). The stock’s low beta profile and consistent uptrend contrast with prior multi‑year underperformance; relative strength has improved into new‑high territory.
CAN SLIM Analysis
Current Quarterly Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth:
Positive. H1 2025 EPS was 46.0p vs 36.9p in H1 2024 (+25% YoY). Operating profit +28% YoY; Fund Management EBITDA +112% YoY (boosted by catch‑up fees). Note: Management flagged H2 fund management income will be lower without catch‑ups; investors should look for sustained fee growth from PC IV deployment to offset this normalisation.
Annual Earnings Increases:
Supportive. TTM EPS ~£0.88 (88p). Independent data points indicate EPS and revenue exceeded expectations for FY24 and earnings grew ~24% YoY. Street sources cite an earnings growth outlook (~8% p.a.) as funds scale, with consensus Buy recommendations and double‑digit upside targets around 1,050p–1,120p.
New Products, Management, or Price Highs:
Multiple “N”s. New Chair (Lynn Fordham) and CFO (Crispin Goldsmith). New geographies (Abu Dhabi office). New funds: PE Fund V final close at €1.5bn (>€2bn incl. co‑invest), PC IV exceeding £1bn commitments by Q3. Potential portfolio catalyst: early talks around a Markerstudy IPO (press). Technically, shares are near 52‑week highs—an O’Neil positive.
Supply and Demand:
Favourable. Shares outstanding declined (c.60.2m) with 4.0m in treasury; £29.2m buybacks since Mar 2024 reduce float. Average daily volume ~108k (3‑month). Dividend yield in mid‑single digits and buybacks together support net demand. O’Neil looks for tight supply—buybacks and consistent institutional demand from UK mid‑cap funds help.
Leader or Laggard:
Improving. Price is above 50/200DMA with RS trending up near 52‑week highs. However, over the last year POLN slightly underperformed the broader UK Capital Markets cohort at some points (per third‑party data), so it is more an emerging leader than a sector pace‑setter. Continued outperformance vs peers would strengthen the L.
Institutional Sponsorship:
Adequate and building. Coverage from multiple brokers (e.g., Peel Hunt BUY TP ~1,046p; Berenberg BUY TP ~1,050p; average target ~1,065p). FTSE 250 membership and addition to global indices increase visibility. Insider/management refresh (Chair/CFO) and Abu Dhabi presence should broaden LP/institutional interest.
Market Direction:
Constructive but selective. UK equities have been mixed, yet private credit/alternatives remain in favour. Trend-wise, POLN trades above rising 50/200DMA—align with O’Neil’s rule to buy in confirmed uptrends. Macro watch: any sharp risk‑off move, fund‑raising slowdown, or rates spike could pressure flows and multiples.
Key Risks
Primary Risk
Fee and earnings volatility tied to fundraising cadence and performance fees—H1 benefited from catch‑up fees that won’t repeat in H2; if PC IV deployment or future raises slow, management-fee growth could undershoot and EPS momentum could stall.
Secondary Risks
- Private credit cycle/credit losses: a turn in the credit cycle could impair on‑balance‑sheet returns and temper LP appetite.
- Valuation marks/equalisation: rapid fund scaling can temporarily dilute reported Investment Company returns via equalisation; private asset marks could be pressured in risk‑off markets.
- Regulatory/policy risk: changes to pension allocation rules, carried interest, or capital requirements could affect flows and profitability.
- Leverage and liquidity: interest‑bearing borrowings (~£206m) and mid‑cap liquidity require disciplined risk control.
- Execution: sustaining management fee margins >40–50% depends on operating leverage and continued fundraising success.
What Would Change My Mind
Bearish: (1) PC IV deployment/fundraising stalls or PE realizations underwhelm, driving fee growth below guidance; (2) sharp deterioration in credit performance or material markdowns; (3) persistent EPS decline (two+ sequential halves) and a decisive break below the 200DMA on heavy volume. Bullish: (1) AuM scales toward the £10bn medium‑term target on schedule; (2) Fund management EBITDA margin trends sustainably >50% without catch‑up fees; (3) visible realization activity (e.g., successful IPOs/exits) and stable double‑digit EPS growth.
Conclusion
In O’Neil terms, POLN shows rising EPS, strong AuM growth, several ‘New’ catalysts, improving RS near 52‑week highs, and favourable supply via buybacks—while trading at a reasonable multiple with a healthy cash return. Buy on constructive pullbacks toward the 50‑day (~900p) or on a clean breakout to new highs with strong volume. Reassess if H2/H1 comps reveal weakening organic fee growth ex catch‑ups, if PC IV momentum fades, or if price loses the 200DMA on heavy volume.
Research Sources (23 found)
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) Hits New 12-Month High
Published: 11/28/2025
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) Given "Buy" Rating at ...
Published: 11/19/2025
Interim Accounts H1 2025 | Company Announcement
Published: 9/16/2025
Pollen Street Group (LSE:POLN) - Stock Analysis
Published: 6/29/2025
Pollen Street Group Ltd, POLN:LSE summary
Published: 6/13/2025
Spotawheel secures €300M to scale used car subscriptions across Europe – Pollen Street
Published: 11/6/2025
Pollen Street sees assets under management up on strong fundraising
Published: 11/18/2025
Pollen Street acquires majority stake in Leonard Curtis
Published: 8/22/2025
Leonard Curtis sells majority stake to Pollen Street Capital
Published: 8/21/2025
Pollen Street Eyes IPO for Markerstudy at £3 Billion Value (2)
Published: 11/12/2025
Directorate Change | Company Announcement | Investegate
Published: 6/20/2025
Pollen Street Group Names Lynn Fordham Chair, James Gillies NED
Published: 6/20/2025
IN BRIEF: Pollen Street hires NewRiver REIT chair to lead board
Published: 6/20/2025
Result of AGM | Company Announcement | Investegate
Published: 6/13/2025
POLN Investor Relations - Pollen Street PLC
Published: 9/16/2025
Metro Bank Faces Potential Buyout as Pollen Street Circles: What It Means for the Future of UK Markets - FinTech Weekly
Published: 6/16/2025
Metro Bank shares surge on talk of private equity takeover by Pollen Street Capital
Published: 6/17/2025
Metro Bank takeover approach adds to fears of London Stock Market exodus
Published: 6/14/2025
Metro Bank attracts takeover interest from Pollen Street Capital
Published: 6/18/2025
Metro Bank receives private equity takeover approach: Reports – Mortgage Strategy
Published: 6/16/2025
Pollen Street Group in Early Talks with Investment Banks for Markerstudy IPO
Published: 11/13/2025
Investment Outlook 2026: Seeking Catalysts Amid Complexity
Published: 11/18/2025
Pollen Street ups dividend as profit, assets higher; outlook confident
Published: 9/16/2025
Search Queries Generated
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN earnings quarterly results revenue growth margins guidance
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN competitive position market share competitors moat advantages
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN management governance CEO strategy capital allocation insider activity
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN bear case risks headwinds concerns
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN macro catalysts industry trends upcoming events regulatory impact
Warren Buffett
Overview
A Warren Buffett–style intrinsic value review of Pollen Street Group Limited (LSE:POLN), focusing on business simplicity, moat durability, management quality, financial strength, and a conservative appraisal of intrinsic value versus price for a long-term investor.
Business Understanding
Pollen Street is a specialist alternative asset manager focused on financial and business services across two engines: (1) the Asset Manager, which earns recurring management and variable performance fees from Private Credit and Private Equity funds; and (2) the Investment Company (on-balance-sheet capital) that co-invests alongside its funds, compounding returns and aligning interests with LPs. The model is straightforward: grow fee-paying AUM, convert it into management fees and carry over time, and reinvest or distribute cash through dividends/buybacks. This is a simple, predictable fee-and-carry business with an understandable credit investment sleeve—well within the circle of competence of a long-term, fundamentals-first investor.
Economic Moat Analysis
Moat sources appear to be: (a) Intangible assets and reputation in mid‑market alternatives and asset-based lending, evidenced by strong fundraising and top-tier returns track record; (b) Switching costs and relationship capital—locked-up capital, long-dated funds, and co-investments create client stickiness; (c) Process/know‑how advantages—repeatable origination and structuring capabilities in private credit and sector expertise in financial and business services; (d) Scale benefits—operating leverage in fund management (EBITDA margin guided >50% medium term) as AUM scales. The moat is not as impregnable as a network monopoly, but for a focused specialist manager with demonstrable fundraising momentum and alignment capital, it is reasonably wide and durable so long as performance and client service remain strong.
Management Quality
Management has executed well: H1’25 fee-paying AUM up 37% YoY to £4.7bn, total AUM up 35% to £6.1bn, and continued momentum to £6.7bn by Q3’25, with Credit Fund IV surpassing £1.1bn in commitments and PE Fund V closing at €1.5bn (over €2bn including co-invest). Capital allocation is shareholder-friendly—progressive dividends (c. 27p interim) and meaningful buybacks (~£29m since 2024; a further £30m program announced Nov’25). Leadership refresh adds depth: incoming Chair Lynn Fordham (ex-SVG Capital) and CFO Crispin Goldsmith. Communications are specific (fee rates, catch-up fees, equalisation effects) and guidance is measured. Overall, incentives, candor and track record indicate a capable, shareholder‑oriented team.
Financial Strength
Profitability: trailing EPS ~£0.82–£0.88 (TTM), with net margins >40% on a consolidated basis (SWS TTM net margin ~42%). Fund Management EBITDA margin 43% in H1’25 (inflated by catch-up fees), with medium-term target >50% as scale builds. Returns: On stated equity, ~8–10%; on tangible equity, likely mid‑teens given large goodwill/intangibles. Balance sheet: interest-bearing borrowings ~£206m vs tangible equity ~£357m (net debt/tangible equity ~56%). Finance costs (H1’25: ~£8.3m) are well covered by operating profit (~£30.9m). Cash generation: low capex, modest D&A; owner earnings close to net income. The Investment Company generated 8.4–9.1% annualised returns YTD’25 (pre equalisation), with guidance to low double‑digits over time. Overall, financial strength is solid with manageable leverage and resilient fee income.
Intrinsic Value Assessment
Earnings power: FY’24 net income ~£49.6m (SWS), TTM EPS ~82–88p; H1’25 EPS 46p despite catch-up fees normalising in H2. Owner earnings approximate net income given low D&A and capex (H1’25 D&A ~£1.24m; capex ~£0.3m), so owner earnings per share roughly mid‑80s pence on a normalised basis. Growth: fee‑paying AUM is compounding (medium‑term target £10bn), with underlying management fee rate ~1.25–1.5% and operating leverage. Performance/carry should be lumpy but additive over a cycle (15–25% of Fund Management Income). Sum‑of‑the‑Parts (conservative): (1) Asset Manager FRE (normalised, after-tax) valued ~12x: ~£190m; (2) Carry/performance optionality: ~£50–£75m; (3) Investment Company at ~1.0x TNAV: ~£357m. Midpoint SOTP ≈ £620m (~1,020–1,040p/share on ~60.2m shares). A simpler earnings multiple cross‑check at ~12x normalised owner earnings (~85p) supports ~1,020p. At ~954p, the margin of safety is modest (~7–10%). Fair value range: ~950–1,100p, with upside if AUM reaches £10bn and margins exceed 50%. Current price embeds little error but not deep mispricing.
Key Risks
Primary Risk
Fundraising or fee pressure combined with weaker investment performance—this would compress recurring fees, reduce carry, and impair the perceived moat.
Secondary Risks
- Credit cycle stress in asset‑based lending (higher losses, tighter funding or higher funding costs) reducing Investment Company returns and fundraising appetite.
- Performance fee volatility and equalisation/catch‑up timing can create earnings lumpiness and complicate valuation; a sustained drought in realisations would depress high‑margin carry.
- Key person and concentration risk in a specialist manager; regulatory or reputational issues (e.g., large, complex deals) could impair brand.
- Leverage at the holding/investment company level increases sensitivity to rates and market spread shocks.
What Would Change My Mind
Bullish: Fee‑paying AUM >£8–10bn with >50% Fund Management EBITDA margin delivered, sustained 9–12% Investment Company returns, and visible multi‑year carry pipeline—this would justify a premium multiple and a higher intrinsic value. Bearish: 2–3 quarters of net outflows or fee-rate compression, rising credit impairments, or a failed fundraise—this would shrink intrinsic value and mandate a lower multiple.
Research Sources (23 found)
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) Hits New 12-Month High
Published: 11/28/2025
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) Given "Buy" Rating at ...
Published: 11/19/2025
Interim Accounts H1 2025 | Company Announcement
Published: 9/16/2025
Pollen Street Group (LSE:POLN) - Stock Analysis
Published: 6/29/2025
Pollen Street Group Ltd, POLN:LSE summary
Published: 6/13/2025
Spotawheel secures €300M to scale used car subscriptions across Europe – Pollen Street
Published: 11/6/2025
Pollen Street sees assets under management up on strong fundraising
Published: 11/18/2025
Pollen Street acquires majority stake in Leonard Curtis
Published: 8/22/2025
Leonard Curtis sells majority stake to Pollen Street Capital
Published: 8/21/2025
Pollen Street Eyes IPO for Markerstudy at £3 Billion Value (2)
Published: 11/12/2025
Directorate Change | Company Announcement | Investegate
Published: 6/20/2025
Pollen Street Group Names Lynn Fordham Chair, James Gillies NED
Published: 6/20/2025
IN BRIEF: Pollen Street hires NewRiver REIT chair to lead board
Published: 6/20/2025
Result of AGM | Company Announcement | Investegate
Published: 6/13/2025
POLN Investor Relations - Pollen Street PLC
Published: 9/16/2025
Metro Bank Faces Potential Buyout as Pollen Street Circles: What It Means for the Future of UK Markets - FinTech Weekly
Published: 6/16/2025
Metro Bank shares surge on talk of private equity takeover by Pollen Street Capital
Published: 6/17/2025
Metro Bank takeover approach adds to fears of London Stock Market exodus
Published: 6/14/2025
Metro Bank attracts takeover interest from Pollen Street Capital
Published: 6/18/2025
Metro Bank receives private equity takeover approach: Reports – Mortgage Strategy
Published: 6/16/2025
Pollen Street Group in Early Talks with Investment Banks for Markerstudy IPO
Published: 11/13/2025
Investment Outlook 2026: Seeking Catalysts Amid Complexity
Published: 11/18/2025
Pollen Street ups dividend as profit, assets higher; outlook confident
Published: 9/16/2025
Search Queries Generated
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN earnings quarterly results revenue growth margins guidance
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN competitive position market share competitors moat advantages
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN management governance CEO strategy capital allocation insider activity
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN bear case risks headwinds concerns
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN macro catalysts industry trends upcoming events regulatory impact
Stanley Druckenmiller
Overview
A Druckenmiller-style, top-down to bottom-up investment analysis of Pollen Street Group Limited (LSE: POLN), blending macro cycle views, reflexivity, thematic tailwinds in private markets, and opportunistic positioning with clear risk management.
Macro Context
Cycle: Late-cycle slowdown transitioning to easing. Most G10 central banks began cutting in 2025 and are expected to ease further into 2026, while Japan tightens modestly. Policy: UK Mansion House reforms continue nudging pension capital toward private markets; global policy mixes higher fiscal spend (defense, energy transition, infrastructure) with disinflationary monetary trends. Geopolitics: Fragmented world order, supply-chain rewiring, and resource security raise demand for asset-based lending and private capital solutions. Secular trends: Structural shift from public to private markets; institutional allocations to private credit rising; Middle East capital pools growing; AI-driven capex lifts demand for financing and specialty lending platforms. Net takeaway: A constructive backdrop for alternative asset managers with scalable platforms, strong LP relationships, and credit underwriting discipline.
Company Position in Macro Landscape
Pollen Street is positioned directly in the capital flows from public to private markets: fee-paying AuM grew 37% YoY to £4.7bn in H1’25 and total AuM to £6.1bn, then to £6.7bn by 30 Sept ’25. Fundraising momentum: PE Fund V closed at €1.5bn (over €2bn incl. co-invest), while Private Credit Fund IV surpassed its initial £1bn target with £1.1bn commitments by Q3. The firm leans into mid-market alternatives and asset-based lending—segments in demand as banks remain selective and borrowers prize speed/certainty. Opening an Abu Dhabi office broadens access to Middle East LPs. Management guides to medium-term AuM of ~£10bn, fee rate ~1.25–1.50%, and >50% fund management EBITDA margin—high-operating-leverage model matched to macro tailwinds.
Reflexivity Analysis
Positive loop: Strong performance and fundraising → higher fee-paying AuM → rising management fees and operating leverage (H1’25 fund management EBITDA +112% YoY; margin 43%, aided by catch-up) → higher EPS/dividends/buybacks → stronger share price → easier fundraising and brand equity → further AuM. Reinforcers: Analyst Buy consensus with double-digit target upside, visible pipeline in Private Credit IV, and portfolio exit optionality (e.g., potential Markerstudy IPO) that can crystalize performance fees and carried interest. Negative loop risks: If deployment slows, performance fees underwhelm (management flagged H2 catch-up normalisation), or credit impairments rise, EPS momentum could stall and hamper fundraising. Share buybacks (c. £29m since 2024) tighten float, amplifying EPS reflexivity on the upside—and downside if buybacks pause.
Competitive Position & Disruptive Threats
Moat: Focused expertise in financial & business services, proven direct-lending/asset-based structures with security and first-loss protections, and a balanced model (third-party AuM manager + investment company co-invest) that aligns with LPs. Evidence: 35% AuM growth to £6.1bn H1’25, further to £6.7bn Q3; strong fee growth and scalable margins. Peers: UK-listed alternatives/capital markets peers (Foresight Group, Tatton AM, etc.) generally lack the same combination of PE + Private Credit scale within financial services verticals. Threats: Fee compression as mega-cap managers compete; if banks reassert lending share, spread/terms tighten; governance scrutiny (AGM ‘Rule 9 Waiver’ support <80%) could weigh on sentiment; reliance on continued LP risk appetite. Adaptability: Management expanding distribution (Abu Dhabi), broadening investor base (NA/Middle East) and executing bolt-ons (Leonard Curtis) to sustain platform growth.
Asymmetric Risk/Reward
Upside: - Structural growth to £10bn AuM supports recurring fee compounding; medium-term fund management EBITDA margin guide >50% gives high operating leverage. - Private Credit Fund IV final close and deployment converts commitments to fee-paying AuM; Markerstudy IPO could crystalize performance fees/carry; continued buybacks + 5–7% dividend yield create attractive TSR math. - Consensus targets (~1,046–1,072p) imply low-teens price upside near term; medium term, re-rating on execution could be higher. Downside: - H2 fee normalisation post catch-up; performance fees at low end of guide; credit losses rising if macro weakens; fundraising pauses. Entry: Shares near 52w highs but still on ~9–11x TTM P/E and mid-to-high single-digit yield; 50/200dma trends are positive, suggesting momentum plus income. Optionality: Portfolio monetisations (e.g., Markerstudy) and Middle East LP distribution expansion provide non-linear upside triggers beyond base-fee growth.
Key Risks
Primary Risk
Fundraising/deployment shortfall in Private Credit IV or a macro shock that stalls LP flows, compresses fee growth, and delays performance fee realization.
Secondary Risks
- Credit cycle turn elevates impairments and depresses carry/performance fees.
- Fee compression as competition intensifies; banks re-enter niches pressuring spreads.
- Governance/ownership optics and regulatory changes dampen sentiment (e.g., Rule 9 waiver sensitivities).
- FX/geopolitical shocks that slow Middle East/International capital raising.
What Would Change My Mind
Failure to close PCF IV as guided or materially slower conversion to fee-paying AuM; two consecutive halves of below-expected management/performance fees; a step-up in credit losses beyond equalisation/seasonality; or evidence of LP outflows.
Research Sources (23 found)
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) Hits New 12-Month High
Published: 11/28/2025
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) Given "Buy" Rating at ...
Published: 11/19/2025
Interim Accounts H1 2025 | Company Announcement
Published: 9/16/2025
Pollen Street Group (LSE:POLN) - Stock Analysis
Published: 6/29/2025
Pollen Street Group Ltd, POLN:LSE summary
Published: 6/13/2025
Spotawheel secures €300M to scale used car subscriptions across Europe – Pollen Street
Published: 11/6/2025
Pollen Street sees assets under management up on strong fundraising
Published: 11/18/2025
Pollen Street acquires majority stake in Leonard Curtis
Published: 8/22/2025
Leonard Curtis sells majority stake to Pollen Street Capital
Published: 8/21/2025
Pollen Street Eyes IPO for Markerstudy at £3 Billion Value (2)
Published: 11/12/2025
Directorate Change | Company Announcement | Investegate
Published: 6/20/2025
Pollen Street Group Names Lynn Fordham Chair, James Gillies NED
Published: 6/20/2025
IN BRIEF: Pollen Street hires NewRiver REIT chair to lead board
Published: 6/20/2025
Result of AGM | Company Announcement | Investegate
Published: 6/13/2025
POLN Investor Relations - Pollen Street PLC
Published: 9/16/2025
Metro Bank Faces Potential Buyout as Pollen Street Circles: What It Means for the Future of UK Markets - FinTech Weekly
Published: 6/16/2025
Metro Bank shares surge on talk of private equity takeover by Pollen Street Capital
Published: 6/17/2025
Metro Bank takeover approach adds to fears of London Stock Market exodus
Published: 6/14/2025
Metro Bank attracts takeover interest from Pollen Street Capital
Published: 6/18/2025
Metro Bank receives private equity takeover approach: Reports – Mortgage Strategy
Published: 6/16/2025
Pollen Street Group in Early Talks with Investment Banks for Markerstudy IPO
Published: 11/13/2025
Investment Outlook 2026: Seeking Catalysts Amid Complexity
Published: 11/18/2025
Pollen Street ups dividend as profit, assets higher; outlook confident
Published: 9/16/2025
Search Queries Generated
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN earnings quarterly results revenue growth margins guidance
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN competitive position market share competitors moat advantages
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN management governance CEO strategy capital allocation insider activity
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN bear case risks headwinds concerns
Pollen Street Group Limited POLN macro catalysts industry trends upcoming events regulatory impact